Story telling told by television or
visually is better than printed media when trying to research it and when
telling stories with a group of others it limits what kinds of things everyone
gets to say but with groups of groups there is added variety.
On my research paper, the media I
was examining was television. Understanding things as they were being shown to
me in the television show I wrote about was much easier than had it been in a
book. The storytelling they used was a more straightforward and all the details
were drawn out for you to see. Unlike in any printed type of media, because it
was on TV I could see everything happen in order and if I needed to do research
on a specific part then I was able to just go find that episode on Netflix.
I think about what the show I researched
would be like had it been told in print media which is interesting because it
was originally print media before becoming a TV series. I’ve never read it but
it would be interesting to compare it to the show and see how accurate the show
is to the book. Comparing differences and similarities from the two would make
me question why they put certain things in the show and why other ideas were
left out. Maybe things were written differently in the TV series due to lack of
resources when filming, or possibly they writers changed scripts to please the
fans in some cases. When you write something and an audience reads it is one
thing but actually showing something to an audience could changes their
perception of it.
When my group was doing the digital
story telling there was three of us in the group. I found out soon after
starting that we may have had different ideas about where to take the story.
The ideas that each of us put forth put forth separately were scrutinized by whosever idea it wasn’t. I personally wanted to push the boundaries of the story
and make it a little more gruesome and dark. This included adding some pictures
that could’ve given the story a different vibe or writing characters in the
story to death or adding some promiscuity to them. The rest of my group
sometimes felt my pictures or ideas were not best for the flow of the story and
we decided to not try and walk the line of what is offensive and good
storytelling. This was a little upsetting for me but I suppose as long as we
got a good grade it doesn’t matter and maybe some other groups decided to write
with the same aggressiveness I would’ve like to.
Both of my examples show how the
possibility of the reading audience perceiving a story as offensive or
something they don’t like can change the storytelling process drastically. However
I wish that things were a little bit looser and the storytellers had less
restrictions or fears of how they would be perceived and then write a story
the way they believe it should be told.
I completely agree with your thoughts on going from print to television media. Television would be much easier to analyze because it would be easier to find details. Some people are very upset if details are left out of a print medium that was turned into a visual one. Because the media are so different, there are some things that cannot be included in the switch.
ReplyDeleteI agree that it is a lot easier to understand stuff shown on television rather than read a print version of the same material. I am much more of a visual learner and find it easier when it is shown in front of my face. On some occasions, however, I enjoy reading the book more than I do watching a movie of the same plot. As for the digital story project, you probably would have liked being in our group, considering we decided to go with a lot of gruesome ideas and events. We all agreed that this would give a little more excitement to the story.
ReplyDelete