Differences Between a Research Paper and Creative Writing
Research
papers and creative writing papers are both pieces of literature that are very
unique and contain a number of similarities. They both contain an opening,
middle and closing that are informative and bring the reader onto a 2-5 minute
journey. Necessary background information is needed before anyone writes either
one in order to gain familiarity on the topic and whether it is outside sources
or other people contributing to the creative paper, different perspectives are
key in order to enhance and develop the main topic. Although there are many
other similarities between research and creative writing papers, there are also
many differences between them that make each other stand out from purpose,
tone, and audience.
Research
and creative writing papers are both exist to tell a story, but why they are
written is different. Research papers exist because the author wants to inform
the audience on a specific topic. His or her goal, is to educate and make sure
their point is able to get across without confusion. They may be simply writing
an objective paper, or they are writing to either support or counteract an
argument. The author of a creative writing piece’s goal is entertain or to
express thoughts, feelings and emotions rather than to convey information.
The purpose of each kind of paper has an immense influence on the tone of the
author. For research papers, the author is very informative and they are often
objective, but sometimes there is some subjectivity, so that the author
contributes their feelings. The way a research paper is written is very
structured and organized. Before the paper is even written the author must put
all of their ideas onto a paper and then piece together where everything goes.
The audience should know what and where points a, b and c are and should easily
be convinced by the evidence that supports them. On the other hand the tone of
a creative paper is very subjective, but it also requires focus on
communication. The genre often determines the tone; thrillers use tight, lean
phrasing, romances tend to be more effusive and expressive, comedies more
buoyant, and so on. Unlike researchers, creative writers have the personal
freedom to write about anything they want. They can write about fact or
fiction, it doesn’t matter, just as long as the paper makes sense and is able
to take the reader onto an entertaining ride. Because there is already a
predetermined purpose in the paper, there is also a predetermined audience. In
research papers, the author is trying to convince a specific audience. Whether
the audience is for a certain gender, race, class, or any other organization of
people it is solely meant for them. The author’s main point is reflective on
who he or she is trying to convince. A creative author’s audience is universal.
Anyone can read their fictional story or their thoughts or feelings. The author
wants everyone to read what they have to write about. There could be a specific
audience in mind, but even if you are not in that group, anyone can still read
it. There is no confusion in the audience when they read creative pieces.
Research papers and creative papers
are both have very interesting context and have similarities in the way they
are written, but the purpose, tone, and audience are different. Differences
between these two kinds of paper make the reader prepare themselves in
different ways, but each have their own rhetoric and content styles that makes
each one unique and worth the read.
I agree with your statement about the author’s purpose for writing each type of paper. A creative writing piece is written to entertain the audience more than anything else. There’s not really any opinion involved when writing a creative piece. A research paper, however, is written to inform the audience about a certain topic. I also agree that most research papers are objective. This is the first research paper that I was told to add some subjectivity. The usual requirements are just to construct a thesis and back it up with factual evidence. In this paper, we were told to incorporate some of our own thoughts.
ReplyDelete